Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Could a simple progesterone shot replace standard IVF drugs?

NCT ID NCT07350317

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This phase 4 trial will compare a daily shot of natural progesterone (Prolutex) against the standard drug cetrorelix for preventing early ovulation in women undergoing freeze-all IVF. About 230 women aged 18-40 will be enrolled. The goal is to see if progesterone works just as well, potentially offering a simpler and cheaper option.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
subcutaneous natural progesterone (Prolutex)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could offer a simpler, more cost-effective alternative to current medications for preventing early ovulation during IVF.
What could go wrong
This is an early-stage comparison of two approved drugs, so the new use may not prove as effective. The trial is small (230 participants) and not yet recruiting, so results are uncertain.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Phase 4

Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.

Participants

About 230 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jan 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Feb 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 40 years

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Women aged 18-40 years. 2. Body Mass Index \< 35 kg/m² 3. Antral Follicle Count ≥ 8 or Anti-Müllerian Hormone ≥ 1.2 ng/mL 4. Undergoing freeze-all IVF (for Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome - OHSS risk, PGT- Preimplantation Genetic Testing, or personal preference) Exclusion Criteria: 1. Poor responders (Bologna criteria) 2. Stage III-IV endometriosis 3. Pituitary or hypothalamic dysfunction 4. Planned fresh embryo transfer 5. Severe Male Factor. Semen Count \<1 ×〖10〗\^6 (\<1 Million/ml) or Azoospermia)

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Assisted reproductive techniques are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  2. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.