ICU phosphate study: less may be more
NCT ID NCT07288944
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study will compare two standard approaches for replacing phosphate in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). One approach starts replacement at a higher phosphate level (liberal), the other at a lower level (restrictive). The goal is to see if the restrictive approach reduces the amount of phosphate given while keeping patients just as healthy. About 2,400 adult ICU patients will take part, and the main measure is how many days they are alive and out of the ICU within 30 days.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- phosphate replacement protocols (liberal vs. restrictive)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that a more restrictive phosphate replacement strategy is safe and reduces unnecessary treatment in ICU patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is an early-stage protocol comparison, not a test of a new drug. The results may not apply to all ICU settings, and the study hasn't started recruiting yet.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 2,400 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Jan 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * All adult patients admitted to participating intensive care units during the study period. Exclusion Criteria: * There will be no specific exclusion criteria
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Critical care, intensive care are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Common phosphate supplements may skew a key hormone test, study asks
- Can smart glasses give ICU patients a voice?
- Can a coordinated care team ease the aftermath of intensive care?
- Could a wearable sensor replace fingerstick tests in the ICU?
- Smart ventilator may help burn patients breathe easier
- Dental scans and AI could spot rare bone diseases faster