Tucked arms study tests muscle monitor accuracy
NCT ID NCT06805032
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two devices that measure muscle response during surgery when the patient's arms are tucked at their sides. Researchers will check how accurate and consistent these monitors are in 40 people having surgery without muscle relaxants. The goal is to see which device works better in this common surgical position.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 40 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Mar 2025
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients undergoing elective surgery and requiring general anesthesia without administration of neuromuscular blocking agents.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients willing to participate and provide an informed consent. * Patients undergoing elective surgical procedures that require general anesthesia without use of NMBA agents administered intraoperatively, and tucked arms. * Anticipated surgery duration \< 120 minutes. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with disorders, such as stroke, carpal tunnel syndrome, broken wrist with nerve damage, Dupuytren contracture, or any similar wrist injury. * Patients with systemic neuromuscular diseases such as myasthenia gravis. * Patients having surgery that would involve prepping the arm into the sterile field.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cystoscopy are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Disposable scope takes on stent removal – does it stack up?
- Which dose of spinal numbing is safer for bladder scopes?
- VR goggles and drumbeats reduce pain during bladder scope procedure
- Simple urine test could spot bladder cancer early
- Simple cleaning step may cut infection risk in hysterectomy
- Pee test could replace painful bladder scopes for cancer patients