Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Laser showdown: which technology smashes kidney stones best?

NCT ID NCT07516106

Symptom relief Sponsor: NYU Langone Health Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study will compare two types of lasers used to break up kidney stones during a procedure called ureteroscopy. About 70 adults with a single kidney stone or multiple stones totaling 7-20 mm will be randomly assigned to receive either a pulsed Thulium:YAG laser or a pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG laser. The main goal is to see which laser leaves fewer stone fragments behind one month after surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Thulium:YAG laser and Holmium:YAG laser (Moses technology)
What this could lead to
If one laser proves more effective, it could become the preferred tool for kidney stone removal, leading to faster procedures and fewer residual fragments.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage comparison study with only 70 participants. Results may not apply to all stone types or sizes, and neither laser is expected to be a breakthrough cure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 70 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jun 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Jun 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Solitary renal stone 7 to 20 mm in size or in the case of multiple stones the conglomerate diameter (additive maximal diameter of all stones on axial imaging of computed tomography) of 7-20 mm is required * Must be a suitable operative candidate for flexible ureteroscopy per American Urological Association guidelines * Must be 18 years or older * Must be able to give consent * Bilateral ureteroscopy will be permitted , but only the side(s) where the FANS access sheath was used (per surgeon discretion) will be included in the study, however can include both sides as separate units. Subjects will be enrolled only once in the study. No subject will be enrolled more than a single time. For patients undergoing bilateral ureteroscopy, each kidney will be considered a separate unit for stone-related assessments. Peri-patient measures, such as operative time, will be recorded at the patient level. Bilateral cases will be clearly identified and handled consistently to ensure accurate and appropriate interpretation of study outcomes. * Must be a patient of one of the surgeons participating in this study. Exclusion Criteria: * Concomitant stones in the ureter * Prior radiotherapy to the abdomen or pelvis * Neurogenic bladder or spinal cord injury * Pregnancy * Untreated urinary tract infection (UTI) * Anatomical abnormalities (including, but not limited to, bifid system, pelvic kidney, horseshoe kidney) * Prior ipsilateral upper urinary tract reconstructive procedures or history of ipsilateral ureteral stricture

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Kidney stone are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Kidney Calculi nephrolithiasis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Kidney stone

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    2 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Mayo Clinic Arizona

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, United States

  • NYU Langone Health

    New York, New York, 10016, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.