Ultrasound vs. traditional method: which better guides fluid treatment in sepsis?
NCT ID NCT07279064
First seen Jan 07, 2026 · Last updated May 20, 2026 · Updated 17 times
Summary
This study compares two methods—ultrasound of the inferior vena cava and central venous pressure monitoring—to see which better predicts fluid needs in patients with septic shock. Researchers will enroll 70 adults in the emergency department to evaluate accuracy. The goal is to improve how doctors decide on fluid resuscitation, potentially leading to better outcomes.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE AND INFERIOR VENA CAVA DISTENSIBILITY INDEX IN ASSESSING FLUID RESPONSIVENESS IN SEPTIC SHOCKED PATIENTS are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.