Ultrasound vs. standard monitor: which better guides septic shock fluid care?
NCT ID NCT07279064
First seen Jan 07, 2026 · Last updated May 17, 2026 · Updated 16 times
Summary
This study compares two methods—ultrasound of the inferior vena cava and central venous pressure monitoring—to see which better guides fluid treatment in septic shock patients. Researchers will enroll 70 adults in the emergency department to measure how well each method predicts fluid needs. The goal is to improve care by identifying the most accurate approach.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE AND INFERIOR VENA CAVA DISTENSIBILITY INDEX IN ASSESSING FLUID RESPONSIVENESS IN SEPTIC SHOCKED PATIENTS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.