Feeding tube Face-Off: which saves more money?
NCT ID NCT04030871
First seen Mar 09, 2026 · Last updated May 20, 2026 · Updated 8 times
Summary
This study compared two types of feeding tubes used for long-term nutrition. The goal was to see if a newer, more expensive tube lasts longer and is more cost-effective than the standard tube. Seven adults who needed a feeding tube for over a year took part. The study was stopped early, so results are limited.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LONG TERM ENTERAL TUBE FEEDING are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Endoscopy Doan
Columbus, Ohio, 43212, United States
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.