Spine surgery showdown: which cage helps bones fuse better?
NCT ID NCT06904898
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two types of implants used in back surgery for people with worn-out discs in the lower spine. About 60 adults will receive either a PEEK cage with bone-growing protein or a CONDUIT cage during a procedure called DLIF. Researchers will check which cage leads to better bone fusion and patient recovery.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 60 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Mar 2021
- Expected to finish
-
Jul 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * • Patients with one to two consecutive level lumbar degenerative disease from L2to S1, including Grade 1 (\<25%) Spondylolisthesis * Patients undergoing direct lateral interbody fusion (transpsoas or anterior-to-psoas approach) for lumbar disease * Skeletally mature patients, aged 18 and older * Patients able to fully comply with the clinical protocol and adhere to the follow-up schedule and protocol requirements * Patients able to understand and sign the study-specific, IRB approved informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: * • Spondylolisthesis greater than Grade 1 * Traumatic lumbar disease * Spinal Deformity * Coronal Cobb angle greater than 40 degrees * Severe sagittal imbalance * Existing fusion construct longer than 2 consecutive levels * Active infection - systemic or local * Tumor diagnosis * Untreated osteoporosis, defined as T Spine \< -2.5 on DEXA scan * Active smoking habit * Current incarceration * Pregnancy * Involvement in an active spinal litigation
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Degenerative lumbar disease are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Hands-On therapy put to the test for spine and jaw pain
- Belly fat vs. body mass index: which better predicts spine surgery risks?
- Disc replacement may keep patients working longer than spinal fusion
- Can a bone drug prevent spine surgery failures?
- Which rehab works best after back surgery? new study aims to find out
- Back pain breakthrough? study pits two key surgeries against each other