Tooth pain study seeks best numbing technique
NCT ID NCT07409896
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jul 31, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares two ways to numb a painful lower back tooth before a root canal. One method uses a standard injection near the jaw nerve, while the other uses a different numbing medicine injected near the tooth. The goal is to see which approach provides better pain relief during the procedure. The study will involve 330 healthy adults aged 18-55 with a specific type of tooth inflammation.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 330 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Mar 2026
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 55 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Systemically healthy patients classified as ASA I, aged 18-55 years. * Permanent mandibular first molar tooth requiring endodontic therapy. * Diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis without swelling or sinus. * Normal periapical radiographic appearance (no evidence of periapical pathology). * Moderate pain as assessed by the Heft-Parker VAS (\>54 mm and \<114 mm). * Lingering pain or prolonged response to cold testing (lasting more than 10 seconds). * Positive response to electric pulp testing. * Outcome assessed must be pulpal anesthesia Exclusion Criteria: * • Pregnant or lactating mothers. * Teeth with reversible pulpitis, previously treated, or with calcified canals. * Teeth with severe periodontal disease or periapical radiolucency. * Patients who have taken analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs within 6 hours before the treatment visit. * Patients on medications that could potentially interact with the anesthetic solution (e.g., antihypertensives, anticoagulants). * History of allergy to 4% articaine, lidocaine, or epinephrine. * Systemic diseases, immunocompromised states, or significant anxiety/mental health disorders. * History of vasovagal syncope on local anesthetic administration
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Anesthetic efficacy are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry AFID CMH Rawalpindi
RECRUITINGRawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.