3D-printed vs milled teeth: which temporary implant wins?
NCT ID NCT05958043
First seen Jan 07, 2026 · Last updated May 22, 2026 · Updated 18 times
Summary
This study looked at two ways to make temporary full-arch dental implants: one is milled from a solid block, the other is 3D-printed. Twenty adults with no teeth in one or both jaws received these temporary implants and used them normally for three months. Researchers checked for cracks, wear, color changes, and other problems to see which material performed better.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DENTAL PROSTHESIS FAILURE are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
School of Dentistry, Complutense University. Pza Ramón y Cajal s/n.
Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.