3D-Printed teeth vs. milled: which lasts longer?

NCT ID NCT05958043

Completed Symptom relief Sponsor: Universidad Complutense de Madrid Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested two types of temporary dental implants: one made by 3D printing and one by milling. Twenty patients with missing teeth received these implants and were followed for three months. Researchers checked how well the implants held up and if their color changed over time.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: 3D-printed resin and PMMA milled material for dental implants
What this could lead to: If successful, this could point toward better, longer-lasting temporary dental implants that are more comfortable and durable for patients.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage trial with only 20 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The study only looks at short-term use (3 months), so long-term benefits are unknown.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DENTAL PROSTHESIS COMPLICATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Jaw, Edentulous

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

DENTAL PROSTHESIS COMPLICATION DENTAL PROSTHESIS FAILURE EDENTULOUS JAW

Contacts and locations

Locations

School of Dentistry, Complutense University. Pza Ramón y Cajal s/n.

Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.