3D-Printed teeth vs. milled: which holds up better?
NCT ID NCT05958043
First seen Jan 07, 2026 · Last updated May 10, 2026 · Updated 16 times
Summary
This study compared two types of temporary full-arch tooth implants: one made by milling and the other by 3D printing. Twenty adults missing all teeth in one or both jaws received these temporary implants and used them normally for three months. Researchers checked for cracks, wear, and color changes to see which material performed better.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DENTAL PROSTHESIS FAILURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
School of Dentistry, Complutense University. Pza Ramón y Cajal s/n.
Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.