3D-Printed teeth vs. milled: which lasts longer?

NCT ID NCT05958043

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested two types of temporary dental implants: one made by 3D printing and one by milling. Twenty patients with missing teeth received these implants and were followed for three months. Researchers checked how well the implants held up and if their color changed over time.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

3D-printed resin and PMMA milled material for dental implants

What this could lead to

If successful, this could point toward better, longer-lasting temporary dental implants that are more comfortable and durable for patients.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage trial with only 20 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The study only looks at short-term use (3 months), so long-term benefits are unknown.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DENTAL PROSTHESIS FAILURE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Jaw, Edentulous

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • School of Dentistry, Complutense University. Pza Ramón y Cajal s/n.

    Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain