Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Antibiotic showdown: which drug works best for staph blood infection?

NCT ID NCT03248063

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two antibiotics, cloxacillin and cefazolin, in 315 adults with a serious bloodstream infection caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). The goal was to see if cefazolin works as well as cloxacillin, the standard treatment, while potentially having fewer side effects and being easier to use. The main measure of success was a combination of survival, clearing the infection, and no relapse at 90 days.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Cloxacillin and cefazolin (antibiotics)
What this could lead to
If cefazolin works as well as cloxacillin, doctors may have a safer, more reliable option for treating this serious bloodstream infection.
What could go wrong
This is a completed trial, so results are available. However, the study is relatively small (315 participants) and open-label, which can introduce bias. The findings may not apply to all patient groups.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

315 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Sep 2018

Finished

Mar 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age above 18 years 2. Blood culture positive to MSSA identified by standard bacteriologic techniques or by GeneXpert PCR Exclusion Criteria: 1. Previous type 1 or grade 3 - 4 according to CTCAE hypersensitivity reaction to beta-lactams 2. Known pregnancy or breastfeeding women 3. Parenteral antimicrobial therapy active against MSSA for more than 72 hours after the positive SA blood culture ponction 4. Chronic renal failure defined by a glomerular filtration rate estimated \< 30 mL/min/1,73m². 5. Presence of an intra-vascular implant (vascular or valvular prosthesis or cardiovascular implantable electronic device) 6. Patient with implanted material considered to be infected by SAMS and whose antibiotic treatment is longer than 70 days 7. New cerebro-spinal signs in the preceding month 8. Clinical examination compatible with recent stroke (\<1 month), brain abscess or meningitis 9. Current other antibiotic therapy which cannot be ceased or substituted by study treatment 10. Mixed blood culture with more than one pathogen (excluding contaminants: Corynebacterium sp., Propionibacterium sp., Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci) 11. coagulapthy with TP\< 50% (excepted for patients under avk anticoagulant treatment) 12. Absence of written informed consent from the patient 13. Limitation of care with expected life duration below 90 days 14. Patient under guardianship or trusteeship 15. No affiliation to social security (beneficiary or assignee) 16. Subject already involved in another interventional clinical research evaluating a medicinal product Secondary exclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosis of meningitis made after randomisation 2. Diagnosis of brain abscess made after randomisation 3. Diagnosis of multiple infection made after randomisation

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Bacteremia due to methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • François-Xavier Lescure

    Paris, 75018, France