Which anal fissure surgery heals faster? new study investigates
NCT ID NCT07496216
First seen Mar 29, 2026 · Last updated May 20, 2026 · Updated 10 times
Summary
This study compared two surgical techniques for chronic anal fissure, a painful tear in the anal lining. 160 patients were randomly assigned to either a closed or open surgical procedure. The main goal was to see which method led to better wound healing at 6 weeks, with additional checks on pain, return to work, and long-term outcomes.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC ANAL FISSURE are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Locations
-
Services Institute of Medical Sciences
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.