Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Anal fissure surgery showdown: closed vs open technique

NCT ID NCT07496216

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two surgical methods for treating chronic anal fissures in 160 adults. The goal was to see which technique leads to faster wound healing, less pain, and fewer complications like incontinence or recurrence. Participants were randomly assigned to either closed or open surgery, and followed for up to one year.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

160 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Feb 2019

Finished

Jan 2026

Lead sponsor

A government agency

The lead sponsor is a government body.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

20 to 70 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosis of chronic anal fissure (symptoms \> 6 weeks) * Failure of conservative medical management (dietary fiber, stool softeners, topical lignocaine, and at least 4 weeks of topical glyceryl trinitrate 0.2%) * Willing to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Multiple fissures * Concomitant anorectal pathology (anal fistula, abscess, significant hemorrhoids, rectal cancer) * Inflammatory bowel disease * Previous anorectal surgery * History of anoreceptive intercourse * Psychiatric disease or inability to consent

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Chronic anal fissure are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Services Institute of Medical Sciences

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.