Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Heart surgery vs. stents: which is safer for your brain?

NCT ID NCT07491120

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study will follow 600 people who need either bypass surgery (CABG) or a stent (PCI) to open blocked heart arteries. Researchers will test memory and thinking skills before the procedure and again at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years after. The goal is to see if one approach leads to more long-term cognitive decline.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this study could help patients and doctors choose between CABG and PCI based on cognitive risks.
What could go wrong
This is an observational study, not a treatment trial, so it won't directly improve outcomes. Results may show no clear difference between the two procedures.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 600 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jan 2027

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Jan 2033

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

The CDAC Study is an observational, two-group, non-randomized cohort of 600 patients undergoing elective CABG or PCI

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Criteria for enrollment are age 18 years or more. * A candidate for either elective single or multi-vessel CABG or PCI without limits for lesion location, lesion characteristics or complexity, the number of vessels treated, or the number of stents or bypass grafts placed, or the type of bypass grafts. * The decision to undergo either CABG or PCI will be made by the treating physician and patient before research study enrollment, and thus, the revascularization decision is not directed by this research protocol. Exclusion Criteria: Patients will not be enrolled due to: * Concomitant valve therapy (surgical or transcatheter). * Prior CABG or surgical valve repair/replacement surgery. * PCI within 1 year of the study entry procedure. * A hybrid revascularization procedure (PCI plus CABG), an untreated carotid artery stenosis of \>70%, inability to provide informed consent. * The inability to perform pre-procedure tablet-based neurocognitive testing. * The lack of stated agreement to return for follow-up on-site neurocognitive testing at the prescribed time points.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CABG are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Cognitive Dysfunction coronary artery disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  2. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.