Can online CBT coaching ease anxiety in kids with autism?

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Clinician's inclusion criteria: All practitioner participants will regularly treat at least some youth with ASD within a recognized field of practice (e.g., clinical psychology, counseling, marital and family therapy, social work) and will serve youth with ASD referred by the Regional Centers, Tricare/NMCSD, or the California public schools. Practitioners will agree to invite one or more potentially eligible families of youth with ASD so that, in total, at least 2 of the new families referred to them participate in the study (i.e., each clinician will aim to have a cluster of two families randomized to the same condition with them; however, the two referrals can be non-parallel and clinicians will not be required to enroll a second client to remain in the study, since there is no way for them to guarantee future enrollment from client families. As needed, additional clinicians can be enrolled in the study to reach the target of 100 youth.). Up to four families per practitioner will be allowed so long as the minimum study enrollment of at least 50 practitioners and 100 client families randomized is met. Youth inclusion criteria: Youth participants will be boys or girls between 6 and 14 years of age with a documented clinical diagnosis of ASD and will be newly referred for outpatient services with a participating clinician. Additional eligibility criteria are as follows: 1. Youth will have a pre-existing clinical diagnosis of ASD made by an appropriate licensed professional (e.g., clinical psychologist, developmental pediatrician) which will be documented in a report or medical note provided by the family, or confirmed telephonically by the diagnosing professional. 2. The parent-reported Social Responsive Scale-2 (SRS-2; Constantino \& Gruber, 2012) Total T-Score will be \> 60 (cut-score maximizing ROC curve parameters for screening for ASD; area under the curve = 98.8%; Schanding et al., 2011). 3. Youth will meet criteria for clinically significant emotion dysregulation symptoms as defined by a minimum T-score of 60 on the Externalizing or Internalizing subscales of the parent-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) and at least 15 T-score points over 50 between these two BPM subscales (e.g., Internalizing=60 + Externalizing=55). 4. The youth has a Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3 Communication Composite Standard Score \> 60 and Expressive Communication subscale v-score \> 8 (in both cases \> 1st %ile). Exclusion Criteria: 1\. For participants presenting with severe comorbid symptomology (e.g., psychotic symptoms), the comorbid conditions cannot be sufficiently severe to warrant immediate treatment or require ongoing medication titration.