Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Which catheter drains faster? small study puts two devices to the test

NCT ID NCT06918067

Symptom relief Sponsor: Wake Forest University Health Sciences Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares how fast urine flows through two different catheters designed for women who regularly use catheters to empty their bladder. Seventeen women will test both catheters during one visit, and answer questions about satisfaction a week later. The goal is to see if one catheter allows faster drainage, which could make catheter use more efficient and comfortable.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
14 Fr two eyelet Coloplast SpeediCath female urinary catheter and 14 Fr Coloplast Micro Zone Luja female catheter
What this could lead to
If one catheter works better, it could help women empty their bladder faster and more comfortably.
What could go wrong
This is a very small study (17 people) comparing two similar devices, so results may not apply to everyone. It only measures flow speed, not long-term safety or effectiveness.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 17 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Nov 2025

Expected to finish

Mar 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Female * Regular use of intermittent catheters to empty bladder, for at least 1 month before enrolment * Age 18 years or older * Required to adhere to the intervention procedure and not participate in any other clinical studies throughout the duration of this study Exclusion Criteria: * Severe urinary tract abnormalities (e.g. excessive production of urinary mucus/sediments/debris) * Hypersensitive to the ingredients in the catheters being tested * Recent surgery, within 3 months * Currently being treated for urinary tract infection * Being pregnant or breastfeeding * Non-English speaking

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Urinary retention are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Urinary Retention

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Urinary retention

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Women's Center for Pelvic Health (Mercy)

    RECRUITING

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.