New hip implant aims to improve joint replacement outcomes
NCT ID NCT06564636
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study is testing the CATALYSTEM hip system in 119 people who need a total hip replacement due to conditions like arthritis or hip damage. The goal is to see if the implant is safe and works well, focusing on how long it lasts without needing a second surgery. Participants will be followed for two years after surgery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- CATALYSTEM cementless primary hip system (a medical device)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could support approval of a new hip implant that may improve joint function and reduce the need for revision surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage study with only 119 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. As with any surgery, risks include infection, implant loosening, or complications.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
119 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Mar 2036
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Participants who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria at participating sites in both the United States and Canada.
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. a. Subject needing primary THA due to end stage degenerative joint disease (primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis), avascular necrosis, post-traumatic arthritis, inflammatory arthritis, or congenital hip dysplasia and, as part of standard of care, the surgeon determines that surgical treatment with the CATALYSTEM™ is the recommended implant for the subject. OR 1. b. Subject has undergone primary THA with the S+N CATALYSTEM™ Primary Hip stem in the past 12 months for end stage degenerative joint disease (primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis), avascular necrosis, post-traumatic arthritis, inflammatory arthritis, or congenital hip dysplasia and all the following conditions have been met for the appropriate timepoint: * Preoperative Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): * Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior (HOOS, JR.) * European Quality of Life (EuroQol) Five-dimensional Five-level (EQ-5D-5L), and * Radiographs have been obtained: ° Anterior Posterior (AP) Pelvis * AP Hip\*, and * Lateral\*\* * 6-Weeks ° PROMs (HOOS, JR., and EQ-5D-5L), and * Radiographs (AP Pelvis, AP Hip\*, and Lateral\*\*) have been obtained or these can be collected prospectively in window per schedule of events, and * 1-Year ° PROMs (HOOS, JR., and EQ-5D-5L), and ° Radiographs (AP Pelvis, AP Hip\*, and Lateral\*\*) have been obtained or these can be collected prospectively in window per schedule of events 2\. Subject agrees to consent and to follow the prospective study visit schedule by signing the Independent Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved Informed Consent Form (ICF). 3\. Subject is eighteen to eighty (18-80) years old (inclusive). 4\. Subject can read, understand, and communicate responses to the PROMs. footnote: \*For the AP radiographs, Standing AP is preferred. For standardization, sites MUST ensure that positioning (standing AP or supine AP) is consistent across all study visits for subjects (i.e., if subject had standing AP at pre-op then collect standing AP at all visits). \*\* Frog-lateral is preferred. However, lateral radiograph may include any one of the following: Cross-Table Lateral (CTL) or Frog-lateral or lateral femoral/Lauenstein. For standardization, sites MUST ensure consistency across all study visits for subjects (i.e., if subject had frog-leg lateral at pre-op then collect frog-leg lateral at all visits). Exclusion Criteria: Any one (1) of the following criteria will disqualify a potential subject from participation in the study: 1. Subject has conditions that would eliminate or tend to eliminate adequate implant support or prevent the use of an appropriately-sized implant, e.g.: * Blood supply limitations * Insufficient quantity or quality of bone support e.g., osteoporosis, or metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation, and or osteomalacia * Mental or neurological conditions which may tend to impair the patient's ability or willingness to restrict activities; or impairing or precluding cooperation with post-operative protocols including mental illness, drug or alcohol abuse. * Physical conditions or activities which tend to place extreme loads on implants and may impair short and long-term satisfactory results of the implant, e.g., Charcot joints, muscle deficiencies, multiple joint disabilities, etc. * Infections or other conditions which may lead to increased bone resorption * Skeletal immaturity 2. Subject has a Body Mass Index (BMI) \>/= 45 at time of surgery. 3. Subject has a known allergy to one or more components of the study device. 4. Any subject that meets the definition of a Vulnerable Subject per ISO 14155 Section 3.55 (i.e., individuals who are unable to fully understand all aspects of the investigation that are relevant to the decision to participate, or who could be manipulated or unduly influenced as a result of a compromised position, expectation of benefits or fear of retaliatory response). 5. Subject is entered in another drug, biologic, or device study or has been treated with an investigational product 30 days prior to the surgery date. 6. Subject is known to be at risk for lost to follow-up, or failure to return for scheduled visits. 7. Women who are pregnant or nursing. 8. Subject has participated previously in this clinical trial and has been withdrawn. 9. Subject has an active infection - systemic or at the site of intended surgery. 10. Subject had a contralateral (opposite) hip replacement that was implanted less than 3 months prior to consent, is scheduled for a simultaneous contralateral hip implant, or plans to have their contralateral hip implanted within 3 months following this study-specific implant (known as 'staged bilateral THA'). 11. Subject with a medical or physical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude safe subject participation in the study.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Avascular necrosis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Concordia General Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2K 2M9, Canada
-
Connecticut Orthopaedic Institute
Hamden, Connecticut, 06518, United States
-
Duke Health
Morrisville, North Carolina, 27560, United States
-
Illinois Bone and Joint Institute
Des Plaines, Illinois, 60016, United States
-
London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC)
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
-
NYU Langone Health Orthopedic Hospital
New York, New York, 10003, United States
-
Orlando Health Inc.
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
-
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
-
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
-
University of California at San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94158, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Custom knee guides put to the test in obese patients
- Can a simple wash stop the bacteria behind shoulder surgery infections?
- Brain waves may reveal how well a sedative blocks surgical pain
- Hip replacement showdown: does the labrum stay or go?
- Surgeons test augmented reality to Fine-Tune knee replacement cuts
- Can a purified form of ibuprofen better tame osteoarthritis pain?