3D-Printed tooth restorations face off against milled ones in new trial
NCT ID NCT05943782
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two ways of making dental onlays (custom tooth restorations) for damaged molars: milling from a solid block versus 3D printing. Thirty adults with cavities, broken teeth, or old fillings will receive either a milled or 3D-printed onlay. Researchers will check how well the onlays fit and function over one year using digital scans and clinical exams.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- dental onlay (milled or 3D-printed ceramic restoration)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that 3D-printed onlays are as good as milled ones, offering a faster or cheaper option for dental restorations.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 30 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The study focuses on short-term fit and function, not long-term durability.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 30 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Sep 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 50 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Presence of caries lesion, defective amalgam, or composite restorations in posterior dentition (molars), suitable for the restoration with ceramic onlays. 2. Presence of antagonist tooth. 3. Adult patients (age: 18-50 years) of both genders. 4. Good general and oral health; Able to tolerate necessary restorative procedures and willing to sign an informed consent. 5. Absence of orthodontic appliances. 6. Absence of malocclusion and tooth malformation. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Presence of non-carious cervical lesions. 2. Pregnant women. 3. Allergy to any of the restorative materials. 4. Mobile teeth, indicating periodontal disease or trauma. 5. External or internal resorption.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Broken teeth are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
AinShams university
Cairo, 11263, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a toothbrush and mouthwash cut pneumonia in the elderly?
- Braces and bacteria: can we predict cavities during orthodontic treatment?
- Text messages may boost oral health in refugees
- AI vs. cavities: could a computer help dentists see decay sooner?
- Sealants or varnish? study finds best way to protect Kids' new molars from decay
- Dentists study which cavity removal method keeps mouth bacteria healthiest