Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Tube size showdown: could smaller breathing tubes improve recovery?

NCT ID NCT06939361

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only This study
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Sep 10, 2026 · Updated 3 times

Summary

This study looks at whether using a smaller breathing tube during emergency intubation helps critically ill adults breathe easier and have better voice and swallowing six months later. About 3,180 patients in emergency rooms and intensive care units will be randomly assigned to get either a smaller or larger tube. The goal is to find out which size leads to less breathlessness and fewer long-term side effects.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If it works, this could show that using a smaller breathing tube reduces long-term breathlessness and voice problems after emergency intubation.
What could go wrong
This is a pragmatic trial comparing tube sizes, not a new drug or device. The results may show no clear benefit or could be influenced by other factors in critical care.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 3,180 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

May 2025

Expected to finish

Jun 2029

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patient is undergoing orotracheal intubation with an endotracheal tube in a participating unit * Planned operator is a clinician expected to routinely perform tracheal intubation in the participating unit Exclusion Criteria: * Patient is known to be less than 18 years old * Patient is known to be pregnant * Patient is known to be a prisoner * Use of an endotracheal tube with subglottic suction is planned * Operator has determined that use of a smaller endotracheal tube or a larger endotracheal tube is required or contraindicated for the optimal care of the patient * Immediate need for tracheal intubation precludes safe performance of study procedures

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory failure are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    7 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

  • Denver Health Medical Center

    Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States

  • Hennepin County Medical Center

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415, United States

  • University of Alabama Hospital

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States

  • University of Colorado-Denver

    Denver, Colorado, 80045, United States

  • University of Washington Medical Center

    Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.