Bipolar vs. laser: which prostate surgery is safer?
NCT ID NCT05200065
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two surgical techniques for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): bipolar enucleation and thulium laser enucleation. Sixty men with large prostates (80 grams or more) were randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. Researchers measured operation time, complications, and urine flow improvement to see which method works better.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Bipolar enucleation of the prostate and thulium laser enucleation of the prostate
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves better, it could lead to shorter surgeries and fewer complications for men with enlarged prostates.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 60 participants. Results may not apply to all patients, and both procedures carry risks like bleeding or incontinence.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
60 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2021
- Finished
-
Dec 2022
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Male participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with BPH who are unsatisfied with medical treatment having a Qmax of less than 15 cm/s. 2. Patients with BPH who had refractory retention. 3. Patients with complicated BPH (eg; chronic retention, refractory hematuria, bladder stones). 4. Prostate size of at least 80 grams or more. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with a bladder mass. 2. Patients with prostate cancer. 3. Patients suffering from a urethral stricture. 4. Patients with previous endoscopic or surgical prostate intervention. 5. Prostate size less than 80 grams.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Benign prostatic hyperplasia are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Kasr AlAiny School of Medicine
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 11562, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Laser prostate surgery that spares ejaculation put to a Five-Year test
- Virtual basket laser mode put to the test for faster prostate surgery
- Steam therapy vs. surgery: can a less invasive fix help men with blocked urine flow?
- Listening to patients: a new way to guide prostate treatment?
- A surgical twist that could save ejaculation during prostate surgery
- Water jet surgery: a new wave for prostate relief?