Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Bipolar vs. laser: which prostate surgery is safer?

NCT ID NCT05200065

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two surgical techniques for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): bipolar enucleation and thulium laser enucleation. Sixty men with large prostates (80 grams or more) were randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. Researchers measured operation time, complications, and urine flow improvement to see which method works better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Bipolar enucleation of the prostate and thulium laser enucleation of the prostate
What this could lead to
If one technique proves better, it could lead to shorter surgeries and fewer complications for men with enlarged prostates.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study with only 60 participants. Results may not apply to all patients, and both procedures carry risks like bleeding or incontinence.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

60 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jan 2021

Finished

Dec 2022

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)

Sex

Male participants only

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with BPH who are unsatisfied with medical treatment having a Qmax of less than 15 cm/s. 2. Patients with BPH who had refractory retention. 3. Patients with complicated BPH (eg; chronic retention, refractory hematuria, bladder stones). 4. Prostate size of at least 80 grams or more. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with a bladder mass. 2. Patients with prostate cancer. 3. Patients suffering from a urethral stricture. 4. Patients with previous endoscopic or surgical prostate intervention. 5. Prostate size less than 80 grams.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Benign prostatic hyperplasia are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Kasr AlAiny School of Medicine

    Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 11562, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.