Mesh vs. no mesh: which bladder prolapse surgery holds up better over time?
NCT ID NCT02255994
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 75 women who had surgery for bladder prolapse (a condition where the bladder bulges into the vagina). It compared two techniques: one using a mesh support and one without. The goal was to see which method works better over 5 to 8 years, focusing on whether the prolapse comes back and any complications.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
75 people
The number who actually took part.
- Start date
-
Oct 2014
- Finished
-
Dec 2015
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
60 years and older
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * The patient must have given her informed and signed consent * The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan * Patient included in, randomized and analysed in the PROCURE study (NCT00153257) Exclusion Criteria: * The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship * The patient refuses to sign the consent * It is impossible to correctly inform the patient * Patient not included in the PROCURE study
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cystocele are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bicêtre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France
-
APHP - Hôpital Antoine Beclere
Clamart, 92141, France
-
APHP - Hôpital Beaujon
Clichy, 92110, France
-
CH d'Issoire - Centre Hospitalier Paul Ardier
Issoire, 63503, France
-
CH d'Orange - Hôpital Louis Giorgi
Orange, 84106, France
-
CH de Chartres - Hôpital Louis Pasteur
Le Coudray, 28630, France
-
CH de la Rochelle
La Rochelle, 17019, France
-
CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, 30029, France
-
CHU de Clermont Ferrand - Hôpital Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
-
CHU de Rouen - Hôpital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76031, France
-
Clinique Champeau
Béziers, 34500, France
-
Clinique Mutualiste La Sagesse
Rennes, 35000, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a mesh implant fix a bladder bulge for good? a five-year checkup puts it to the test.
- Robot vs. vaginal surgery for prolapse: which is better? trial stopped early.
- Surgery showdown: which cystocele repair holds up best?
- Could a simple injection replace surgery for pelvic organ prolapse?
- Mesh vs. laparoscopy: which surgery fixes bladder prolapse better?
- New surgery aims to fix bladder prolapse without mesh