Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Personalized vs. standard back pain rehab: which works better for seniors?

NCT ID NCT07699419

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 13, 2026 · Last updated Jul 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of physical therapy for adults aged 60 and older with chronic low back pain. One approach tailors exercises to each person's specific physical problems, while the other uses a standard program to improve overall function. The goal is to see which method is more practical and effective for reducing pain and improving daily activities.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
physical therapy (impairment-based treatment or functional restoration program)
What this could lead to
If one approach proves better, it could lead to more effective, personalized rehabilitation for older adults with chronic back pain.
What could go wrong
This is a small feasibility study with only 18 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The trial tests practicality, not yet effectiveness.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 18 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jul 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Jan 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

60 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * ≥ 60 years * Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain (CNSLBP) * Pain duration ≥ 12 weeks * No identifiable specific spinal pathology * Pain Location * Pain localized between the 12th rib and gluteal folds * With or without non-dermatomal referred pain not extending below the knee * Pain Intensity * Mean pain intensity ≥ 4/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) over the past 7 days * Functional Disability * Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ≥ 20% (moderate disability or higher) * Mechanical Pain Characteristics * Presence of ≥ 2 of the following: * Pain aggravated by movement, loading, or prolonged postures * Pain relieved by rest or positional change * Morning stiffness \< 30 minutes * Absence of constant, non-mechanical night pain Functional Capacity * Able to ambulate independently (with or without assistive device) * Able to actively participate in an exercise-based rehabilitation program * Clinical Stability * Stable medication regimen (analgesics, anti-inflammatories, or related drugs) for ≥ 4 weeks * No planned changes in pharmacological treatment during the study period * Cognitive \& Communication Ability * Able to understand study procedures and follow instructions * MMSE ≥ 24 (or equivalent cognitive screening) * Consent * Provides written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * 1\. Specific Spinal Pathology ("Red Flags") * Suspected or confirmed: * Spinal fracture * Malignancy * Spinal infection * Inflammatory spondyloarthropathy Clinical indicators: Unexplained weight loss Fever or systemic illness History of significant trauma 2\. Radicular or Neurological Involvement * Radiculopathy defined by ANY of: * Dermatomal pain radiating below the knee * Progressive motor weakness * Objective neurological deficit (sensory, reflex, or motor) 3\. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (Severe) * Neurogenic claudication limiting walking to \< 100 meters, OR * Symptoms not relieved by rest or flexion 4\. Prior Surgical or Structural Conditions Lumbar spine surgery within the past 12 months 5\. Medical Contraindications to Exercise * Severe osteoporosis with high fracture risk * Uncontrolled cardiovascular, respiratory, or metabolic disease * Any condition precluding safe participation in rehabilitation 6\. Cognitive or Behavioral Barriers * Severe cognitive impairment (MMSE \< 24) * Inability to comply with study procedures 7\. Confounding Treatment Factors * Participation in structured physiotherapy or rehabilitation within the past 3 months * Planned concurrent rehabilitation during the study 8\. Psychosocial Confounders Ongoing litigation or compensation claims related to low back pain

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Chronic low back pain (CLBP) are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Recovery City Clinic

    Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.