Ventilator may harm the brain, not just the lungs – study eyes link
NCT ID NCT07629973
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jul 28, 2026 · Updated 4 times
Summary
This study looks at whether the force of mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can damage the brain. Researchers will measure a protein called S100B in the blood, which is a sign of brain injury, and track thinking and memory problems over a year. The goal is to understand if certain ventilator settings raise the risk of long-term cognitive issues. 150 adults with ARDS will be enrolled.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help identify which ARDS patients are at highest risk for long-term brain damage, leading to better protective ventilation strategies.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a treatment trial. It will not test any new therapy, and the link between ventilation and brain injury remains unproven in humans.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 150 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Oct 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Oct 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patient * Patient admitted to the intensive care unit less than 48 hours ago * Patient diagnosed with mild, moderate or severe ARDS according to the Berlin classification based on the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, with a minimum PEEP set at 5 cmH₂O (16), of pulmonary aetiology: * Mild ARDS: 200 \< PaO₂/FiO₂ \< 300 mmHg * Moderate ARDS: 100 \< PaO₂/FiO₂ \< 200 mmHg * Severe ARDS: PaO₂/FiO₂ \< 100 mmHg * Patients fitted with an oesophageal pressure measurement catheter (Nutrivent, Sidam, San Giacomo Roncole, Italy) * Patients registered with or covered by a social security scheme * Free and informed consent from the patient or a trusted relative (where the patient is unable to give consent). Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with a history of central nervous system disorders resulting in cognitive impairment * Patients on ECMO * Patients admitted for symptomatic central nervous system disorders * Patients admitted for acute respiratory distress syndrome following cardiorespiratory arrest. * Patients being treated for a psychiatric condition, chronic heavy drinkers, or those undergoing long-term treatment with benzodiazepines, antidepressants or antipsychotics. * Pregnant, breastfeeding or labouring patients * Individuals subject to a legal protection order * Individuals receiving compulsory psychiatric care * Individuals deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory distress syndrome are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can donated immune cells calm the cytokine storm?
- Steroid dose showdown: can more dexamethasone save lives in respiratory failure?
- Breathing machine settings put to the test in severe lung injury
- The hidden breath: how a mismatch between patient and machine may shape ARDS recovery
- Scientists hunt for hidden subgroups in sudden respiratory failure
- AI plus ultrasound could catch heart and lung decline before it turns critical