Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Pill vs shot: testing a simpler way to stop deadly clots after spinal cord injury

NCT ID NCT05484557

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Sep 09, 2026 · Last updated Sep 10, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

People who suffer spinal cord injuries face a high risk of dangerous blood clots, and doctors usually prescribe enoxaparin, a daily injection, to prevent them. This trial compares enoxaparin with apixaban, an oral blood thinner, in 60 adults recovering from spinal cord injury at a rehabilitation hospital. Participants receive one of the two drugs for 6 to 12 weeks, depending on injury severity. Researchers track clot events, bleeding, and blood test results to see how the two treatments compare.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
apixaban, an oral blood thinner, compared with enoxaparin, an injectable blood thinner
What this could lead to
If apixaban works as well as enoxaparin, people with spinal cord injuries could take a pill instead of daily injections to prevent dangerous blood clots.
What could go wrong
This is a small trial of 60 people at one rehabilitation center, so the results may not apply broadly. Blood thinners carry a risk of bleeding, and the trial monitors participants for that.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 60 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Sep 2023

Expected to finish

Feb 2028

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * spinal cord injury (traumatic of not traumatic), Hebrew speaker. Exclusion Criteria: * contra-indication for anticoagulant treatment * concomitant treatment with any other anticoagulant * anticoagulant treatment needed for indications other than VTE prevention following spinal cord injury * active clinically significant bleeding * any lesion or condition considered a significant risk factor for major bleeding. * hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy and clinically relevant bleeding risk * pregnancy or breast-feeding * heart valve related issues * galactose intolerance * active cancer * patients who require thrombolysis or pulmonary embolectomy * patients with renal impairment * sensitivity to excipients of the medication * anti phospholipid syndrome * prosthetic heart valve * acute ischemic stroke

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Spinal cord injuries are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital

    RECRUITING

    Raanana, Israel

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.