AI takes on dental X-Rays: faster, but is it better?
NCT ID NCT07246018
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested whether an AI program (WeDoCeph) can analyze dental X-rays as accurately as the traditional manual tracing method. Researchers compared 15 measurements on 40 X-rays, done both by hand and by AI, at two different times. The goal was to see if AI is reliable enough to help orthodontists plan treatments more quickly and consistently.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- AI software (WeDoCeph) for cephalometric analysis
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could lead to faster, more consistent dental X-ray analysis, reducing time and variability in orthodontic treatment planning.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 40 X-rays. The AI may not work as well on lower-quality images or in patients with complex dental conditions.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
40 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jan 2023
- Finished
-
Jun 2023
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
The study population consisted of radiographs from orthodontic patients at various stages of treatment, including both pretreatment (initial diagnostic) and post-treatment radiographs. All radiographs were high-quality digital or digitized lateral cephalograms suitable for landmark identification and measurement. Patients with surgical rigid fixations, orthodontic appliances visible on radiographs, or dental prostheses were excluded to ensure clear visualization of anatomical landmarks. Additionally, radiographs of very poor quality or from patients with diagnosed syndromes or craniofacial deformities were excluded to maintain consistency in anatomical structure assessment. The unit of analysis is the cephalometric radiograph rather than individual patients, as each radiograph represents a single diagnostic assessment.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Pretreatment/post-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs * High-quality cephalograms with visible anatomical landmarks Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with surgical rigid fixations, orthodontic appliances and dental prostheses visible on radiographs * Very poor quality/diagnostically unacceptable radiographs * Patients with syndromes or with craniofacial deformities
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cephalometric analysis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Orthodontic Specialist Clinic, Kulliyyah of Dentistry
Kuantan, Pahang, 25200, Malaysia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Bite by bite: jaw differences in vietnamese teens could sharpen orthodontic care
- Gum health showdown: fixed vs removable retainers after braces
- AI vs. orthodontist: who reads X-Rays better?
- Braces study measures tooth blood flow to improve safety
- 3D scans may save your gums during invisible braces treatment
- Jaw pain linked to neck changes? new study scans for clues