Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

AI coach gives docs Real-Time sepsis report cards

NCT ID NCT07581340

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of California, San Diego Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

Sepsis is a life-threatening infection response that requires fast, coordinated care. This study tested whether an AI system could give emergency doctors near-instant feedback on how well they followed sepsis treatment guidelines. Sixty-six physicians were split into two groups: one received AI-generated feedback after each patient's discharge, while the other got standard delayed reviews. The goal was to see if faster feedback improved adherence to quality measures.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
AI-powered automated feedback on sepsis care performance
What this could lead to
If successful, this approach could help hospitals provide faster, more detailed feedback to doctors, potentially improving sepsis care quality.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study focused on measuring provider performance, not patient outcomes. The AI feedback may not translate to better survival rates or work in other hospital settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

66 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Dec 2024

Finished

Dec 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients (≥18 years) evaluated in the emergency department Clinical diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock during the emergency department encounter Cases meeting Centers for Medicare \& Medicaid Services (CMS) SEP-1 inclusion criteria Patient encounter managed by an attending emergency physician participating in the study Sepsis "time zero" occurring during the emergency department visit Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who do not meet CMS SEP-1 criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock Sepsis onset occurring prior to emergency department arrival or after hospital admission Encounters without sufficient clinical documentation to assess SEP-1 compliance Patients transferred from another facility with ongoing sepsis care already initiated Cases in which the attending physician of record is not assigned to a study arm

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Sepsis are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

infectious disease with sepsis Sepsis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Sepsis

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • UC San Diego Health

    San Diego, California, 92103-1911, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.