Farming exposures under the microscope: massive health study follows 90,000 participants
NCT ID NCT01399411
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Sep 02, 2026 · Updated 8 times
Summary
This study follows nearly 90,000 farmers and their spouses to track long-term health effects of pesticides, crops, and animals. Participants report new medical conditions, which researchers then confirm through medical records and genetic samples. The goal is to better understand diseases like asthma and Parkinson's in this group.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help identify links between farming exposures and chronic diseases, potentially guiding future prevention strategies.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational study, not a treatment trial. It relies on self-reports and may not prove cause and effect. Results may take years to emerge.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
89,656 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jul 2011
- Lead sponsor
-
A government research agency
The lead sponsor is the US National Institutes of Health.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Current Agricultural Health Study (AHS) participants (licensed pesticide applicators and their spouses from Iowa and North Carolina)
- Ages
-
24 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
* INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: All members of the AHS cohort who were eligible for the Phase 3 interview were eligible for the Phase 4 health follow-up. We will apply the same eligibility criteria for future cohort-wide follow-ups. Individuals who only completed the enrollment questionnaire were excluded from Phase 3 eligibility. Depending upon the disease outcome of interest, we may conduct the disease confirmation and validation efforts under this protocol among all participants in the AHS who provided self-reported diagnoses at any interview (e.g. Baseline, or Phases 2-4). For individuals who are unable to participate, we will allow a proxy to provide the information. For the validation efforts, individuals who do not confirm their diagnosis of interest (via self or proxy report) will not be asked to provide physician contact for medical records. For specimen collection, we will ask the proxy respondent about whether the individual would be able to provide a sample. In order to obtain MRR we will allow the participant or their medical proxy to sign the form. For cases who are cognitively impaired or deceased, a medical proxy will be identified. Determination of cognitive impairment will be made by report of proxy or by interviewer during conversation with participant. Because the AHS enrolled husband - wife pairs, we should be able to identify an appropriate proxy for most participants.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Asthma are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Batelle, Inc.
Columbus, Ohio, 43201, United States
-
NIEHS, Research Triangle Park
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27709, United States
-
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Illinois, 52242, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a simple breath test cut asthma Flare-Ups?
- Walking memory tests may reveal early Parkinson's clues
- Breathing tests face off: can extra lung measurements improve asthma diagnosis?
- The carbon label on your inhaler: can it sway a Doctor's choice?
- Six biologics put to the test in Real-World asthma and COPD care
- A new ankle? researchers track 400 people with an implant meant to restore movement