New study tests if adjustable sockets make prosthetics more comfortable
NCT ID NCT04038580
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared adjustable prosthetic sockets to conventional ones in 29 people with leg amputations. Participants tried different sockets and reported comfort, mobility, and quality of life. The goal was to see if adjustable sockets offer benefits over standard ones.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Adjustable prosthetic sockets (Quatro, Infinite Socket, CJ Socket)
- What this could lead to
- If adjustable sockets prove more comfortable or functional, they could become a standard option for people with leg amputations, improving daily life.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 29 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Adjustable sockets may not work better for all users.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
29 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2019
- Finished
-
Jul 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Unilateral lower-limb amputation * Six months of independent ambulation * Own and regularly wear a prosthesis with socket * Minimum functional level of K2 on the Medicare Functional Classification Level (MFCL): corresponding to "the ability or potential for ambulation with the ability to traverse low-level environmental barriers such as curbs, stairs, or uneven surfaces. Typical of the limited community ambulator" Exclusion Criteria: * Pathology or injury of the intact limb * Medication that affects their ability to walk * Neurologic or cardiovascular disease * Significant vision problems * Suffer from an impaired mental capacity that negatively impacts verbal communication with the clinicians and research team, or requires a Legally Authorized Representative to facilitate communication
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Amputation are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Rosalind Franklin University
Chicago, Illinois, 60064, United States
-
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a motorized knee help amputees walk more? trial puts it to the test
- Can we predict prosthetic success? a study seeks answers
- Can bionic limbs feel real? a trial tests touch feedback for amputees
- Can a common anesthetic dampen phantom limb pain?
- Can tiny electrodes give amputees a better grip on bionic limbs?
- FitBit coaching may help amputees walk more after surgery