New heart valve trial aims to improve treatment for severe aortic stenosis
NCT ID NCT05847751
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jul 24, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This study is testing a new heart valve called ACURATE neo2 in 51 patients with severe aortic stenosis, a condition where the heart's main valve is narrowed. The valve is placed using a tube through an artery, avoiding open-heart surgery. Researchers are tracking how many patients survive or have a stroke after the procedure.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- ACURATE neo2 heart valve (transcatheter aortic valve replacement device)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that the ACURATE neo2 valve is safe and effective for treating severe aortic stenosis in Middle Eastern patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-arm study with only 51 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. The procedure carries risks like stroke or death.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
51 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Mar 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Jul 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
A total of 100 patients from Middle East population with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis will be enrolled
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Subject will be included if all of the following criteria are met: * Patient with severe aortic stenosis defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) \< 1cm2 or AVA indexed to body surface area (BSA) of \< 0.6 cm2/m2, including low-flow severe aortic stenosis defined by stroke volume index (SVI) \< 35ml/m2, as assessed by integration of echocardiographic and invasive measurements * Subject is symptomatic (heart failure symptoms with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class \> I, angina or syncope) * Patient is considered at high (STS-PROM (Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Predicted Risk of Mortality) score \>8) or intermediate (STS-PROM score \>4) risk by the Heart Team. * The heart team agrees on eligibility of the patient for participation and that TAVR (Transcatheter aortic valve replacement) (TAVR) by transfemoral access constitutes the most appropriate treatment modality, from which the patient will likely benefit most * Aortic annulus dimensions suitable (area range: 338-573 mm2 AND perimeter range: 66-85 mm) based on ECG-gated multislice computed tomographic measurements. Findings of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and conventional aortography should be integrated in the anatomic assessment if available * Arterial aorto-iliac-femoral axis suitable for transfemoral access with a minimum access vessel diameter ≥ 6 mm as assessed by multislice computed tomographic angiography and/or conventional angiography * Written informed consent of the patient or her/his legal representative * Patient understands the purpose, the potential risks as well as benefits of the trial and is willing to participate in all parts of the follow-up Exclusion Criteria: * Subject will not be included if any one of the following conditions exists: * Non-valvular aortic stenosis * Congenital aortic stenosis or unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve * Non-calcific acquired aortic stenosis * Anatomy not appropriate for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation due to size of the aortic annulus or degree or eccentricity of calcification of the native aortic valve or tortuosity of the aorta or ilio-femoral arteries * Emergency procedure including patients in cardiogenic shock (low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, mechanical hemodynamic support) * Severely reduced left ventricular (LV) function (ejection fraction \< 20%) * Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in aortic position * Presence of mitral valve prosthesis * Concomitant planned procedure except for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) * Planned non-cardiac surgery within 30 days * Stroke within 30 days of the procedure. * Myocardial infarction within 30 days of the procedure (except type 2) * Evidence of intra-cardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation * Severe coagulation conditions * Inability to tolerate anticoagulation/anti-platelet therapy * Active bacterial endocarditis or other active infections * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy * Contraindication to contrast media or allergy to nitinol * Participation in another trial, which would lead to deviations in the preparation or performance of the intervention or the post-implantation management from this protocol
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Severe aortic valve stenosis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Ain shams Specialized hospital
Cairo, Egypt
-
American University of Beirut
Beirut, Lebanon
-
Badr hospital
Cairo, Egypt
-
King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
-
King Fahad National Guard Hospital
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
-
Magdy Yacoub heart center
Aswān, Egypt
-
National Guard Hospital - King Abdulaziz Medical City
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a single antiplatelet drug beat aspirin after heart valve replacement?
- Lab and body tests aim to find best heart valve for small aortic openings
- New heart valve device tested in humans for first time
- CT scan could guide safer blood thinner use after TAVI
- New heart valve device shows early promise in small study
- Head-to-Head: which new heart valve is best for aortic stenosis?