Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Which dental implant guide is more accurate? new study investigates

NCT ID NCT06404385

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of Valencia Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 27 people who needed dental implants in the back of their mouth. Researchers compared two types of surgical guides—one made the traditional way and one made with a computer (CAD-CAM)—to see which one placed implants more accurately. They measured how far the actual implant position was from the planned position using 3D scans.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could help dentists choose the most accurate guide for placing dental implants, potentially improving implant success and reducing complications.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study with only 27 patients, so results may not apply to everyone. The study measures accuracy but does not test long-term implant success or patient satisfaction.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

27 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Sep 2012

Finished

Dec 2019

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Indication of fixed prosthesis over at least two consecutive implants. * Sufficient residual crest for placing at least two implants 4.1 mm in diameter and 8 mm in length. * Mature bone and healthy soft tissues. * Implants placed via fully guided surgery. * Age \> 18 years. * Good general health. * Non-smokers or smokers of \< 10 cigarettes/day (pipe smokers excluded). * Oral hygiene index \< 3 and bleeding index \< 25%. * Pre- and post- CBCT scan for analysis of accuracy. * Periapical radiographs at loading and after one year. Exclusion Criteria: * Contraindications to implant therapy * Locations with acute infection. * Pregnant or nursing women. * Lack of follow-up.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Computer assisted are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Computer assisted Dental implant

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University of Valencia. Faculty of Medecine and Dentistry. CLINICA ODONTOLOGICA

    Valencia, Valencia, 46010, Spain

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.