New hope for TAVI patients: blood thinners may beat aspirin
NCT ID NCT05035277
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested whether blood thinners (DOACs) work better than aspirin to prevent valve damage and serious heart problems after a less invasive aortic valve replacement (TAVI). 360 patients aged 65-80 were randomly assigned to take either a DOAC or aspirin daily. The main goals were to check for valve thickening on CT scans after one year and to compare rates of bleeding, strokes, heart attacks, and death.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Direct oral anticoagulants (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) compared to aspirin
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that blood thinners are better than aspirin at preventing valve damage and reducing heart-related events after TAVI.
- What could go wrong
- This trial is completed but results are not yet widely reported. The benefit may be small, and blood thinners carry a higher risk of bleeding compared to aspirin.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 3
Large-scale testing in a bigger group. Usually the last step before a treatment can be approved.
- Participants
-
360 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Dec 2021
- Finished
-
Jun 2026
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
65 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Successful trans-catheter aortic valve implantation in patients aged \>65 and \<80 years old at the time of the procedure. Exclusion Criteria: * Strict indication for anticoagulation or anti-platelet drugs * Strict contraindication for anticoagulation or anti-platelet drugs * Overt cognitive failure * Failure to obtain written informed consent * Concomitant use of inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Aortic stenosis are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, 5021, Norway
-
Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet
Oslo, 0772, Norway
-
Oslo Univesity Hospital - Ullevål
Oslo, Oslo, 0424, Norway
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- AI turns routine heart tracings into an early warning for a silent valve disease
- Can a new heart valve offer a safer fix for aortic stenosis?
- Can Open-Heart surgery outperform a Tube-Based valve fix?
- Can a new heart valve restore quality of life?
- Does replacing a heart valve clear fluid from the lungs?
- AI ultrasound could unmask silent heart disease in seniors