3D-Printed spinal cages could revolutionize back surgery
NCT ID NCT05237908
First seen Jul 01, 2026 · Last updated Jul 02, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two types of implants used in spinal fusion surgery: 3D-printed cages and titanium-coated cages. The goal is to see which leads to better bone fusion and less disability for patients with herniated discs or degenerative spine disease. About 78 adults undergoing lumbar fusion will be randomly assigned to one implant type and followed for clinical outcomes like pain and quality of life.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- 3D-printed interbody fusion cage
- What this could lead to
- If 3D-printed cages prove better, they could become the new standard for spinal fusion, potentially improving recovery and reducing long-term disability.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage device comparison. Results may not show a clear advantage, and individual surgical outcomes vary widely.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 78 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Feb 2022
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients will be recruited consecutively. No selection besides the inclusion and exclusion criteria will take place.
- Ages
-
18 to 79 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Indication for one, two or three-segment lumbar interbody fusion according to Instructions for use * Written informed consent for the documentation of clinical and radiological results * Willingness and mental ability to participate at the follow-up examinations Exclusion Criteria: * Patient is not willing or able to participate at the follow-up examination * Patient age \< 18 years and \>80 years * Patient is pregnant * Previous instrumented lumbar spine surgery
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Degenerative disc disease are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60389, Germany
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A conversation before spine surgery could change how patients recover
- Can a new bone graft match the gold standard for spinal fusion?
- Can a nanotube surface help spinal bones fuse faster?
- Can a growth factor from donor bone improve spinal fusion?
- Can a One-Day mindset workshop stop chronic pain after back surgery?
- Can a brace and targeted exercises ease spondylolisthesis pain?