Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

Can 3D printing give kids a better smile after tooth loss?

NCT ID NCT07752147

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing This study
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Aug 07, 2026 · Last updated Aug 07, 2026

Summary

This trial tests whether 3D printed dental bridges are as good as or better than CAD/CAM-made bridges for preschool children who have lost one to four front teeth. The study will compare how long each type of bridge lasts, how healthy the gums stay, and how happy children and parents are with the look and function. Forty healthy children will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two bridge types and will be followed to see which approach offers better results for eating, speaking, and confidence.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
3D printed modified fixed bridge or CAD/CAM fabricated modified fixed bridge
What this could lead to
If 3D printed bridges work as well or better than CAD/CAM ones, they could offer a faster, cheaper, and more comfortable way to restore young children's smiles after tooth loss.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial, so results may not apply to all children. The bridges could fail (debond or break) or cause gum irritation, and 3D printing may not prove superior to the standard approach.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

40 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jul 2025

Expected to finish

Aug 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

3 to 5 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Healthy children (ASA I or II) 2. Premature loss of one to four maxillary primary incisors 3. At least 6 months remaining before the expected eruption of the permanent successor 4. Presence of sufficient healthy abutment teeth (primary canines) 5. Adequate oral hygiene (Plaque Index ≤1). 6. Cooperative child (Frankl Behavior Rating 3, 4). Exclusion Criteria: 1. Children with craniofacial anomalies or syndromes (e.g., cleft lip and palate). 2. Children with developmental dental anomalies affecting the anterior region (e.g., hypodontia, severe enamel defects). 3. Severe gingivitis or periodontal disease around the abutment teeth. 4. Deep bite, severe malocclusion, or traumatic occlusion that could interfere with appliance function. 5. Parafunctional habits that could increase appliance failure( Bruxism, Nail biting, Biting hard objects). 6. Persistent oral habits that may affect appliance stability

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Modified fixed bridge are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Faculty of Dentistry

    Tanta, 31111, Egypt