Can a video replace a teacher for ultrasound training?
NCT ID NCT07790497
First seen Aug 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 28, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial tests two ways of teaching final-year medical students the eFAST ultrasound exam, a quick scan used to find internal bleeding after trauma. Half the students watch a 60-minute instructional video, while the other half get a 60-minute lesson at the bedside with an instructor. Both groups cover the same material, and within an hour each student performs the exam on a healthy volunteer. An evaluator who does not know which training each student received scores their performance to see if the video method matches the hands-on approach.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Standardized video-based eFAST training or instructor-led bedside eFAST training
- What this could lead to
- If video-based training works as well as bedside teaching, it could offer a scalable, low-cost way to teach ultrasound skills to medical students.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small educational trial with 100 students at one medical school, so results may not apply broadly. It measures immediate skills, not long-term retention or patient outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
100 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Aug 2025
- Finished
-
Nov 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: Current enrollment as a final-year (sixth-year) medical student at İstanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine. Participation in the emergency medicine clerkship during the study period. Provision of written informed consent before randomization. Exclusion Criteria: Previous formal ultrasound training. Prior practical ultrasound experience. A physical condition that could interfere with performing an ultrasound examination. Declining or not providing written informed consent.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for EFAST are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Istanbul Medeniyet University
Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a new teaching mix boost Doctors' confidence in endocrine crises?
- Level up teaching: could gamified training boost medical Educators' confidence?
- AI eye teacher could revolutionize medical training
- AI coach could revolutionize how therapists learn massage
- Can AI help doctors better care for Two-Spirit métis patients?
- Can Hands-On hospital training beat online learning for future cardiologists?