Ultrasound could make a common vein procedure safer and faster

NCT ID NCT07701746

Not yet recruiting Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jul 14, 2026 · Last updated Jul 15, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two methods for inserting a central line into the internal jugular vein: using ultrasound guidance versus the traditional landmark technique. The study measures how many needle adjustments are needed, first-attempt success, and total time to access the vein. Results may help determine which approach is more efficient and less risky for patients.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: ultrasound guidance
What this could lead to: If ultrasound proves better, it could become the standard method for this common procedure, reducing complications and improving patient safety.
What could go wrong: This is a single-center study with a moderate number of participants, so results may not apply everywhere. The landmark technique is already widely used and effective in experienced hands.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CENTRAL VEIN CATHETER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

CENTRAL VEIN CATHETER ULTRASOUND

Contacts and locations

Show contact details

Study contacts

Contact

Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

Dicle University

Diyarbakır, Eyalet/Yerleşke, 21070, Turkey (Türkiye)

Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.