Ultrasound showdown: which angle gets the IV in fastest?
NCT ID NCT07683611
First seen Jul 06, 2026 · Last updated Jul 07, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two ultrasound-guided techniques for inserting a peripheral IV line: the short-axis (probe perpendicular to the vein) and the long-axis (probe parallel). Researchers measure which method leads to more successful first-attempt placements, how long each takes, and how often complications like bruising or accidental artery puncture occur. The trial includes adults aged 20 to 60 who need IV access, excluding those with obesity, infection at the site, or arm deformities.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves clearly better, hospitals may adopt it to improve IV placement success and reduce patient discomfort.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-center study with 222 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or settings. The difference between techniques may be small.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERIPHERAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Medical Teaching Institution-Lady Reading Hospital
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.