Ultrasound showdown: which angle gets the IV in fastest?
NCT ID NCT07683611
First seen Jul 06, 2026 · Last updated Jul 07, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two ultrasound-guided techniques for inserting a peripheral IV line: the short-axis (probe perpendicular to the vein) and the long-axis (probe parallel). Researchers measure which method leads to more successful first-attempt placements, how long each takes, and how often complications like bruising or accidental artery puncture occur. The trial includes adults aged 20 to 60 who need IV access, excluding those with obesity, infection at the site, or arm deformities.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If one technique proves clearly better, hospitals may adopt it to improve IV placement success and reduce patient discomfort.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-center study with 222 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or settings. The difference between techniques may be small.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
222 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Nov 2023
- Finished
-
May 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
20 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Men and women aged 20 to 60 years * Required peripheral intravenous access Exclusion Criteria: * Body mass index of 30 kg/m² or greater * Infection at the intended cannulation site * Upper-limb deformity * Previous venous thrombosis * Refusal to participate
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Peripheral venous catheterization are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Medical Teaching Institution-Lady Reading Hospital
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Ultrasound vs. touch: which gets the IV right the first time?
- Virtual nature walks may ease pain and fear during needle procedures
- Mind over matter: mental rehearsal boosts IV skills in med students
- New techniques aim to make IV insertion less painful for those with difficult veins
- VR training may boost nursing Students' confidence in IV insertion