New scoring system could help doctors know when to remove tracheostomy tubes

NCT ID NCT05271786

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 26, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study looked back at the medical records of 192 adults who had a tracheostomy (a breathing tube in the neck) and were later able to have it removed. The goal was to compare different hospital procedures and test a new scoring system that might help predict the best time for removal. The research aims to create more consistent and objective guidelines for this important step in recovery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could lead to more standardized and objective guidelines for safely removing tracheostomy tubes, improving patient outcomes.
What could go wrong
This is a retrospective observational study, so it cannot prove cause and effect. The scoring system needs further prospective testing before it can be widely used.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

192 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Apr 2022

Finished

Nov 2023

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

Patients who underwent a tracheostomy procedure and decannulation during their hospital stay since January 2017 until November 2021.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients \>18 years old 2. Percutaneous tracheostomy 3. At least one decannulation attempt Exclusion Criteria: 1. Surgical/permanent tracheostomy 2. Elective tracheostomy due to neck masses or tumors, in view of a surgical approach 3. Patients tracheostomized more than once

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Tracheostomy decannulation are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • L. Sacco Hospital

    Milan, 20157, Italy

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.