New scoring system could help doctors know when to remove tracheostomy tubes
NCT ID NCT05271786
First seen Jun 26, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study looked back at the medical records of 192 adults who had a tracheostomy (a breathing tube in the neck) and were later able to have it removed. The goal was to compare different hospital procedures and test a new scoring system that might help predict the best time for removal. The research aims to create more consistent and objective guidelines for this important step in recovery.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could lead to more standardized and objective guidelines for safely removing tracheostomy tubes, improving patient outcomes.
- What could go wrong
- This is a retrospective observational study, so it cannot prove cause and effect. The scoring system needs further prospective testing before it can be widely used.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
192 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Apr 2022
- Finished
-
Nov 2023
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients who underwent a tracheostomy procedure and decannulation during their hospital stay since January 2017 until November 2021.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients \>18 years old 2. Percutaneous tracheostomy 3. At least one decannulation attempt Exclusion Criteria: 1. Surgical/permanent tracheostomy 2. Elective tracheostomy due to neck masses or tumors, in view of a surgical approach 3. Patients tracheostomized more than once
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Tracheostomy decannulation are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
L. Sacco Hospital
Milan, 20157, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Incremental dead space versus capping trial to predict the Post-Decannulation respiratory status in tracheostomized critically ill patients: a physiological randomized crossover study
- How do ICUs worldwide manage breathing tubes? a massive study investigates
- Talking valve trial aims to help tracheostomy patients speak and breathe easier
- Wearable tech tracks how removing breathing tubes boosts patient health
- Smartwatch tech could take the guesswork out of tracheostomy tube removal
- Breathing tests could predict safe tracheostomy tube removal