Heart valve showdown: Minimally-Invasive vs. open surgery for common birth defect
NCT ID NCT07413965
Summary
This study aims to find out which of two standard procedures is better for replacing a faulty bicuspid aortic valve, a common birth defect of the heart. It will randomly assign 1,200 participants to receive either a minimally invasive catheter-based procedure (TAVR) or traditional open-heart surgery (SAVR). Researchers will track patients for up to 10 years to compare safety, effectiveness, and recovery between the two approaches.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE DISEASE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.