Which therapy works better for stroke arm recovery? new study aims to find out
NCT ID NCT07598435
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two physical therapy approaches—rhythmic guided movements and static muscle contractions—to see which better improves arm function, strength, and coordination in people who had a stroke 1 to 6 months ago. Forty participants aged 40 to 60 with arm weakness on one side will receive 30-minute sessions, 5 days a week for 4 weeks. The goal is to help therapists choose the most effective rehab technique for regaining arm use.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for STROKE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
The University of Faisalabad
RECRUITINGFaisalābad, Punjab Province, 3800, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Spinal zaps could reboot breathing after brain injury
- Can brain scans reveal hidden language struggles after stroke?
- Can lifestyle choices after a stroke extend life and prevent a second one?
- A tablet test aims to catch hidden attention and memory problems after stroke
- Can a gentle ear zap supercharge stroke rehab at home?
- Can exercise boost reading recovery in stroke survivors?