Back surgery showdown: which fusion technique works best?

NCT ID NCT00869882

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at 60 adults with degenerative spondylolisthesis, a condition where a spine bone slips forward causing pain. All patients needed spinal fusion surgery. The researchers compared two surgical methods: one that fuses the back of the spine only, and another that also fuses the front via the back. The goal was to see which approach leads to better bone fusion, pain relief, and fewer complications.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
surgical procedure (spinal fusion with or without additional interbody fusion)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could help surgeons choose the best surgical approach for better fusion and pain relief in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed trial with only 60 participants. Results may not apply to all patients, and surgery carries risks like infection, bleeding, or nerve damage.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Service de chirurgie orthopédique, Hôpital Pellegrin Tripode

    Bordeaux, 33076, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.