Phone photos could cut the wait for melanoma checks

NCT ID NCT03137511

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Sep 14, 2026 · Last updated Sep 15, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

When a general practitioner spots a skin lesion that might be melanoma, the patient is referred to a dermatologist, but some never go and others wait too long. This trial tests whether the GP calling the dermatologist directly and emailing a smartphone photo of the lesion shortens the time to that consultation. Researchers are enrolling 270 adults with a suspicious skin lesion who are referred by a participating GP. The main measure is how long it takes from the GP visit to the dermatologist visit for patients whose lesion turns out to need removal.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Smartphone photographs of suspicious skin lesions sent by the general practitioner to a dermatologist
What this could lead to
If it works, this could shorten the wait for a dermatologist and help catch melanoma at an earlier, thinner stage, when treatment works best.
What could go wrong
Photos taken on a phone may miss subtle signs a dermatologist would catch in person, and the approach depends on dermatologists being available to review them quickly. The trial measures timing and referral completion, not whether people live longer.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

270 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

May 2017

Finished

Nov 2018

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Accepted

You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: Patients: * Consulting a general practitioner participating in the study, * Having a suspicious cutaneous lesion of melanoma according to the MG, * Referred to a dermatologist who agreed to participate in the study, * \> = 18 years of age, with written informed consent, * Affiliated to a social security scheme Exclusion Criteria: Patients: * Consulting a general practitioner who does not participate in the study, * Having no suspect melanoma lesion according to MG, * Referred to the dermatologist for symptoms or pathologies unrelated to a suspicion of melanoma * Wishing to consult a dermatologist who refused to participate in the study, * Refusing the transmission by mail of 2 anonymised photos, * \<18 years of age, or with no written informed consent. * Major under tutelage, under curatorship

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Patients at risk for melanoma are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University Hospital

    Nantes, France