War zone study: can simulated emergencies train better doctors than online classes?
NCT ID NCT07336784
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested whether simulation-based lectures help first-year anesthesiology residents learn and remember more than online lectures during wartime in Ukraine. Sixty-five residents were randomly assigned to either hands-on simulation training or online classes over three months. Researchers measured knowledge before and after training, plus satisfaction with the teaching method.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- simulation-based lectures
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that hands-on simulation training helps doctors learn better than online classes, even during wartime.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small pilot study with only 65 residents, so results may not apply to other settings. It tests education, not a medical treatment, so direct patient benefits are indirect.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
65 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2024
- Finished
-
Feb 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
Children (under 18), adults (18 to 64) and older adults (65 and over)
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * First-year residents enrolled in the specialty of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care * Enrollment in the first year of residency training at the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, P.L. Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine * Participation in the standard first-year residency curriculum during the study period * Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: * Refusal to participate in the study * Failure to complete the full training program (e.g., due to early termination of training, relocation abroad, or academic leave) * Withdrawal from the study before completion of outcome assessments
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Anesthesiology residency training are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
PL Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine
Kyiv, Kyiv Oblast, Ukraine
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can AI make medical students better at spotting bad advice?
- Can a crash course in AI make doctors better diagnosticians?
- Can VR make future doctors better at cutting and draining abscesses?
- Can a new teaching mix boost Doctors' confidence in endocrine crises?
- Can a video replace a teacher for ultrasound training?
- Level up teaching: could gamified training boost medical Educators' confidence?