Shoulder implant showdown: which material works best?

NCT ID NCT05339815

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study looked at 205 people who had reverse shoulder replacement surgery with one of two types of glenosphere implants (the ball part of the joint). The goal was to see which implant material—cobalt-chromium or a special plastic—was safer and worked better over two years. Researchers checked for implant problems, pain, and shoulder function using patient surveys and X-rays.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

shoulder implant (glenosphere)

What this could lead to

If successful, this could help surgeons choose the best implant material for reverse shoulder replacements, improving patient outcomes.

What could go wrong

This is a completed study comparing existing devices, so it won't lead to a new treatment. Results may not apply to all patients or other implant brands.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, SHOULDER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust

    Wigan, United Kingdom