Could just 5 radiation sessions be as good as 15 for breast cancer?
NCT ID NCT03677427
First seen Jul 21, 2026 · Last updated Jul 22, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial tests whether an accelerated radiation schedule of 5 sessions over 10-12 days works as well as the standard 15-session schedule for women who have had breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. The study measures breast shape changes two years after treatment. If the shorter schedule proves effective, it could mean fewer hospital visits and potentially fewer side effects for patients.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- radiation therapy in 5 sessions versus 15 sessions
- What this could lead to
- If successful, a 5-session radiation schedule could become a standard option, reducing treatment burden and improving quality of life for many breast cancer patients.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single randomized trial; results may not apply to all patients. The shorter schedule might have different long-term side effects or tumor control rates.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
488 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2017
- Finished
-
Jun 2023
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * female patients with non-metastatic breast cancer, * age ≥ 18 years, * breast conserving surgery, * multidisciplinary decision of adjuvant breast irradiation, * informed consent obtained, signed and dated before specific protocol procedures Exclusion Criteria: * distant metastases, * bilateral breast irradiation, * history of previous radiation treatment to the same region * life expectancy of less than 2 years, * planned reconstructive surgery, * conditions making toxicity evaluation difficult (e.g. skin disorders), * patients unlikely to comply with the protocol (e.g. inability to return for follow-up visits or unlikely to complete the study).
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Breast cancer are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Radiotherapie UZ Gent
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Comparison of efficacy and safety between hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiotherapy after breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients: a phase III randomized controlled clinical trial
- Omitting the boost to initially involved but undissected nodal stations that achieved clinical complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in cN3 breast cancer: a phase III randomized study
- Application of 68GA-labeled CD73 targeting probe PET/CT imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer
- Can time with horses help cancer patients feel better?
- Can an oral drug replace injections for advanced breast cancer?
- Can a common steroid shield breast cancer patients from a dangerous drug side effect?