Which heart monitor is better for shock? new study aims to find out
NCT ID NCT07020637
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jul 15, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares two methods for measuring stroke volume (how much blood the heart pumps) in people with shock. It will enroll 30 critically ill adults in the ICU. Researchers will use both an ultrasound (echocardiography) and a noninvasive monitor (bioreactance) to see how well the measurements match.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CRITICAL ILLNESS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University Medical Center Southern Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- AI may predict transfusion needs to shield ICU patients from organ failure
- A simple blood test trend may flag ICU patients at risk
- Could a simple CT scan reveal which ICU cancer patients are at highest risk?
- A gentle touch from family may calm the ICU storm
- Can remote exercise rebuild strength in kids after ICU?
- Fasting in the ICU: a metabolic key to immune response?