Can a new drug sequence build stronger bones than standard care?

NCT ID NCT07772609

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Aug 19, 2026 · Last updated Aug 20, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial tests whether a short course of romosozumab followed by denosumab can increase bone density more than the standard treatment zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and high fracture risk. Participants receive either the romosozumab-denosumab sequence or zoledronic acid infusions, and their bone density is measured over two years. The study aims to see if the new sequence offers a better way to strengthen bones and reduce fracture risk.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Romosozumab followed by denosumab, compared with zoledronic acid
What this could lead to
If successful, this could establish a more effective treatment sequence for osteoporosis, potentially reducing fractures and improving quality of life in high-risk postmenopausal women.
What could go wrong
The trial is relatively small and the comparison is new, so results may not be definitive. Romosozumab carries potential risks like cardiovascular events, and the sequence may not prove superior to standard care.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Phase 4

Runs after approval, following long-term safety and how well the treatment works in everyday use.

Participants

About 216 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jan 2027

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Dec 2031

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

60 years and older

Sex

Female participants only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: 1. The subject is a postmenopausal woman aged 60 years or older at screening. 2. The subject has provided written informed consent before any trial-specific procedure is performed. 3. The subject has osteoporosis at screening defined as a T-score of -2.5 or lower at the total hip or lumbar spine (L1-L4) on central reader confirmed bone densitometry by DXA. 4. The subject is at high fracture risk, defined by at least one of the following: a previous low-trauma fracture after age 50 years (excluding skull, face, fingers and toes); FRAX probability at or above the age-specific Swedish intervention threshold (using Nordic and Nordic borne calculations, as appropriate) in use at screening. 5. Corrected plasma calcium or ionized calcium is within the local reference range before randomization. 6. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration ≥50 nmol/L before randomization. 7. Adequate renal function for zoledronic acid treatment, defined as creatinine clearance ≥35 mL/min calculated using the clinical trial center specified calculation procedure (e.g. the Cockcroft-Gault equation) before randomization. 8. The subject is able and willing, in the investigator's judgment, to comply with the trial procedures and attend scheduled visits. 9. For participants entering the extension, separate written extension consent is obtained before any extension-specific procedure is performed. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Severe osteoporosis, defined as total hip or lumbar spine T-score \< -3.5 and/or prevalent grade 2 or grade 3 vertebral fracture. 2. Previous myocardial infarction or stroke at any time before screening. 3. Transient ischemic attack, unstable angina, coronary or major peripheral revascularization within 12 months before screening, decompensated heart failure, uncontrolled clinically relevant arrhythmia, or any cardiovascular condition that in the investigator's judgment confers unacceptably high risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event during study participation. 4. Use of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy or teriparatide within 3 years before randomization. 5. Use of oral bisphosphonate or denosumab within 12 months before randomization. 6. Any previous use of romosozumab. 7. Use of systemic estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulator within 3 months. 8. Use of oral glucocorticoids for more than 14 consecutive days during the 6 months before screening. 9. Known metabolic bone disease other than postmenopausal osteoporosis, including but not limited to Pagets disease, osteomalacia, untreated hyperparathyroidism, osteogenesis imperfecta, or active renal osteodystrophy. 10. Creatinine clearance below 35 mL/min, rapidly deteriorating renal function, or another renal condition that makes zoledronic acid unsafe. 11. Hypocalcaemia (ionized calcium \<1.15 mmol/l or total albumin corrected calcium of \<2.15 mmol/l) or vitamin D 25-OH-vit-D \<50nmol/l, not corrected before randomization. 12. Unexplained serum alkaline phosphatase \>2 times the local upper limit of normal. 13. Malignancy within the last 5 years, except adequately treated basal-cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous-cell carcinoma in situ of the skin, or cervical carcinoma in situ. 14. Current osteonecrosis of the jaw, unhealed oral or jaw lesions, active dental or jaw infection, or planned invasive dental extraction/implant procedure that has not been completed and healed before randomization, if considered by the investigator to represent a contraindication or unacceptable risk for treatment with romosozumab, denosumab or zoledronic acid. 15. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to romosozumab, denosumab, zoledronic acid, calcium supplementation, or vitamin D supplementation that cannot be safely managed under the protocol. 16. Inability to undergo protocol DXA/VFA reliably, for example because of body habitus exceeding scanner limits, inability to position safely, or interfering hardware or artefacts that prevent valid endpoint assessment. 17. Current participation, or recent participation within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer), in another interventional clinical trial that could affect safety or data interpretation. 18. Any other medical, psychiatric, social or logistical condition that, in the investigators opinion, makes participation unsafe or would compromise protocol adherence or data reliability.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Osteoporosis in post-menopausal women are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    9 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Akademiska sjukhuset

    Uppsala, Uppsala County, 751 85, Sweden

  • Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge

    Huddinge, Stockholm County, 14186, Sweden

  • Linköping University Hospital

    Linköping, Östergötland County, 58185, Sweden

  • Norrlands universitetssjukhus

    Umeå, Västerbotten County, 90185, Sweden

  • Sabbatsbergs sjukhus

    Stockholm, Stockholm County, 11361, Sweden

  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital Mölndal

    Mölndal, Västra Götaland County, 43180, Sweden

  • Skaraborgs sjukhus

    Skövde, Västra Götaland County, 54949, Sweden

  • Skåne Universitetssjukhus

    Malmö, Skåne County, 20502, Sweden

  • Sundsvalls sjukhus

    Sundsvall, Västernorrland County, 856 43, Sweden

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.