Robot vs. camera: which lung cancer surgery is better?

NCT ID NCT02617186

First seen Oct 31, 2025 · Last updated Apr 30, 2026 · Updated 33 times

Summary

This study compares two minimally invasive surgeries for early-stage lung cancer: robotic-assisted and video-assisted (VATS). It aims to see which one gives patients a better quality of life after recovery and which is more cost-effective for the healthcare system. About 446 adults with stage I to IIIa non-small cell lung cancer took part. The results will help doctors choose the best surgical approach.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • McMaster University / St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada

Conditions

Explore the condition pages connected to this study.