Robot coach vs. classic exercises: which better prevents falls in seniors?

NCT ID NCT06973460

Completed Disease control Sponsor: Gulf Medical University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jul 01, 2026 · Last updated Jul 08, 2026 · Updated 3 times

Summary

This pilot study tests whether a robotic system that gives personalized feedback can improve balance and reduce fall risk in older adults better than the standard Otago Exercise Programme. Participants aged 60 to 85 with mild balance issues will use either the Hunova robot or do standard exercises. The goal is to see which approach leads to better stability and walking ability.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Hunova Robotic-Assisted System
What this could lead to: If successful, this could point toward a more personalized, technology-driven approach to fall prevention in older adults.
What could go wrong: This is a small pilot study with only 36 participants, so results may not apply to all older adults. The robotic system may not prove superior to the standard exercise program.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AGED are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

AGED AGED HEALTHY VOLUNTEER BALANCE FALL RISK, FALL PREVENTION GERIATRIC

Contacts and locations

Locations

Thumbay Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital

Ajman, United Arab Emirates

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.