Dental bone graft showdown: which material heals better?

NCT ID NCT04338516

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at how well two different bone graft materials help the jawbone heal after a tooth is pulled. Fifty-four adults each had one non-molar tooth extracted, and the socket was filled with either Ossix™ Bone or Bio-Oss® Collagen. After 16 weeks, a small bone sample was taken to measure new bone growth, how much graft material remained, and the amount of other tissue. The goal was to see if one material leads to better healing for future dental implants.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

bone graft materials (Ossix™ Bone and Bio-Oss® Collagen)

What this could lead to

If successful, this could help dentists choose better materials for preserving jawbone after tooth extraction, improving outcomes for dental implants.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage study with only 54 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It measures healing at a tissue level, not long-term implant success.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for TEETH EXTRACTION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • UT Health San Antonio (UTHSA)

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900, United States