Do psychologists know what they think they know? survey reveals gaps
NCT ID NCT05421637
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study surveyed over 1,500 psychology students across Latin America to see if their self-rated knowledge of evidence-based practice matched their actual understanding. Participants completed an online questionnaire about their familiarity with and use of evidence-based methods. The goal was to identify gaps between perception and objective knowledge to improve training.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
1,506 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Nov 2020
- Finished
-
May 2021
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Latin American psychologists of all specialties and degrees of studies.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Be an active psychology student at any university in Latin America. * To have completed at least one semester of the psychology degree program * Be between 18 and 65 years of age * Be able to read and write * Be a native Spanish speaker * Agree to participate voluntarily in the study. * Sign the informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: * Not currently residing in any Latin American country. * Those persons who have not studied psychology and are performing related activities. * Repeated IP (Internet Protocol) * Marginal frequencies in the sociodemographic data. * Participants who do not answer the complete scales.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Evidence based measurement are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Westhill University
Mexico City, Mexico City, 010, Mexico
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a fellowship make community doctors better teachers and happier at work?
- Can mapping a Coalition's connections boost child health?
- Can a simple test predict which Doctors-in-Training need help?
- Can a simple risk calculator help catch prostate cancer earlier in nigerian men?
- Food safety training put to the test: do workers learn better habits?
- AI tutor for nurses: can ChatGPT improve pain care training?